0

Google’s Motorola issues second appeal of ITC case dismissal against Apple

Motorola has given notice to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it will be contesting the International Trade Commission’s dismissal of a case against Apple, the second time the now Google-owned company has filed an appeal tied to that investigation.





Add to Twitter




AppleInsider – Frontpage News

0

Corning Pits Gorilla Glass 3 Against Sapphire, Plans Reflection Reduction and Antimicrobial Technology

Following Apple’s adoption of sapphire crystal as a strong and durable covering for the rear cameras on the iPhone 5 and fifth-generation iPod touch late last year, rumors of expanded uses for the material have gained some traction. Back in March, we covered a report suggesting that sapphire could see wider adoption as coverings for displays on mobile devices, and just last week a sketchy rumor claimed that Apple is planning to use a sapphire-covered capacitive home button with integrated fingerprint sensor for the iPhone 5S.

corning_gorilla_glass_3
Amid these discussions of the potential of sapphire, Corning has published a feature outlining why its latest Gorilla Glass 3 is in fact already a better option than sapphire for mobile device displays, citing greater strength, lower weight, less energy cost in production, and significantly lower pricing. And with those features has come widespread adoption, with Corning reporting that over 1.5 billion devices have been made with Gorilla Glass.

Jeffrey W. Evenson, [Corning] senior vice president, remarked, “Discussion seems to center around sapphire as an obvious solution for a cover material. What would people say if someone invented a cover that was about half the weight, used 99 percent less energy to make, provided brighter displays, and cost less than a tenth of sapphire? I think they’d say that sapphire was in real trouble. It so happens that we at Corning already invented that cover – and it’s called Gorilla Glass.” Evenson added that the company’s tests so far indicate Gorilla Glass requires about three times more force to break than sapphire after both materials have received similar wear and tear.


Corning also discusses its latest work with Gorilla Glass, noting that the company has already trimmed the materials thickness to the point where it can be curved and shaped without losing strength. Earlier this year, The New York Times reported that Apple was working on a curved glass smart watch, a product that could potentially take advantage of Corning’s latest Gorilla Glass advancements.

Going even further, Corning lays out its future plans for Gorilla Glass, sharing that the company is working hard on new versions that reduce reflections for better visibility in bright sunlight and which incorporate antimicrobial technology to minimize the germs which are prevalent on mobile devices.


Recent Mac and iOS Blog Stories
Voice Search Coming Soon to Chrome for iOS
Former Gartner Research Director Michael Gartenberg Joins Apple's Marketing Team
Twitter for Mac Updated with Notification Center Integration, Bug Fixes
FiftyThree Gives Behind-The-Scenes Look at Developing Paper's Zoom Feature
'Trunk' Posable Lightning Cable Doubles as iPhone Stand
Logitech Targets Schools With New $60 Wired Keyboard for iPad
Apple Named World's Most Valuable Brand for Third Year in a Row
'Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic' Might Come to the iPad
    




MacRumors: Mac News and Rumors – Front Page

0

Allegedly faulty iPhone 4 power button target of new class action lawsuit against Apple

A Florida woman last week lodged a class action lawsuit complaint against Apple reagrding an issue with the iPhone 4′s power button, saying the company continued sales of the handset despite knowing of the problem.





Add to Twitter




AppleInsider – Frontpage News

0

Apple wants to add the Galaxy S4 to its 2014 patent case against Samsung

FOSS Patents reports that Apple is seeking to add Samsung’s latest flagship device — the Galaxy S4 — to its second California case against Samsung, currently scheduled to begin in March of 2014.

Back in April, Judge Lucy Koh instructed both Apple and Samsung that they have until February 6, 2014 to limit the number of accused products to 10 per side. Until then, Apple will have some work to do as the company currently accuses 22 Samsung products of patent infringement.

What’s more, now that Apple has gotten its hands on the Galaxy S4, it wants to add that product to the litigation as well.

The purpose of the responses Apple and Samsung submitted yesterday was to identify 22 accused products per side. The filings reveal a major new disagreement: Apple has analyzed the Galaxy S4, Samsung’s new top-selling product, and “has concluded that it is an infringing device and accordingly intends to move for leave to add the Galaxy S4 as an infringing product”.

In a filing made with the court, Apple notes that it will be willing to drop a product from its current list of 22 accused Samsung devices to make room for the S4. Given that the S4 is Samsung’s flagship Android device, it stands to reason that if Koh allows Apple to add the device as an infringing product, it will ultimately be one of the ten devices Apple will fight against at trial.

Apple wants to add the Galaxy S4 to its 2014 patent case against Samsung originally appeared on TUAW – The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Tue, 14 May 2013 09:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source | Permalink | Email this | Comments
TUAW – The Unofficial Apple Weblog

0

EU says Motorola abused its position by seeking and enforcing injunction against Apple

Motorola Mobility abuses its dominant position in the E.U. by seeking and enforcing an injunction against Apple in Germany on the basis of its mobile phone standard-essential patents (SEPs), the European Commission said in a preliminary antitrust review of the case on Monday.

The Commission opened the investigation into Motorola Mobility in April 2012, about a month before Google’s acquisition of the company closed, to scrutinize whether it abuses its patents that are deemed essential to an industry standard to get a sales ban on products of the infringing party.. Such conduct may be abusive if the potential licensee is willing to enter into a licence on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, the Commission said in a news release.

Motorola Mobility has asserted a standard-essential patent against Apple in Germany that relates to the European Telecommunications Standardisation Institute’s (ETSI) GPRS standard, a key industry standard for mobile and wireless communications, the Commission said.

The Google-owned company committed to license relevant patents on FRAND terms when the standard was adopted in Europe, but still it sought an injunction against Apple in Germany over a GPRS patent, the Commission said. Moreover, after the injunction was granted, Motorola went on to enforce it, even when Apple had declared that it would be willing to be bound by a determination of the FRAND royalties by the German court, the Commission said.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

Macworld

0

EU Antitrust Ruling Says Google Abusing Patent Position in German Lawsuit Against Apple

The New York Times reports that Google and its Motorola Mobility unit have been found to be abusing their patent dominance in 3G wireless networking technology by the European Commission. The ruling, which comes in the form of a preliminary finding that could lead to formal antitrust charges but has yet to do so, addresses Motorola’s efforts to bar European sales of Apple’s 3G mobile devices over infringement of “standards essential” patents that Motorola is required to license under reasonable terms.

apple_google_logos
Apple did briefly pull a number of devices from its German online store in February 2012, but they quickly returned after an injunction was lifted and Apple later won long-term protection from sales bans while its appeal in the case is heard.

The European Commission’s report today calls Motorola’s efforts to enforce a sales ban based on these standards essential patents “an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by E.U. antitrust rules.”

“I think that companies should spend their time innovating and competing on the merits of the products they offer — not misusing their intellectual property rights to hold up competitors to the detriment of innovation and consumer choice,” said Joaquín Almunia, the European Union’s competition commissioner, in a statement Monday, before a news briefing on the topic.

Apple has of course also targeted its competitors with lawsuits seeking sales bans over patent infringement, but Apple’s efforts do not involve standards essential patents that are required to be licensed.

The technology covered by these standards essential patents has been judged to be integral for any device supporting a given functionality, with rights holders being required to license the patents under fair and reasonable terms in order to promote competition. In this case, Apple and Google/Motorola differ on what the reasonable licensing rates should be and thus do not have a licensing agreement in place.


Recent Mac and iOS Blog Stories
New Samsung Galaxy S4 Ad Pokes Fun at iPhone
Redesigned Vox Music Player 1.0 Offers Minimalistic Interface and Support for Multiple File Types
Google Glass Will Soon Add Text and Navigation Support for iPhone Users
Rare Working Apple 1 Computer Headed to Auction
New Party Game 'Heads Up!' Featured on The Ellen Show
Instagram Launches 'Photos of You' Feature, Lets Users Tag People
Social Rovio Title 'Angry Birds Friends' Hits the App Store
Photo Gallery of Stunning New Berlin Apple Store

    




MacRumors: Mac News and Rumors – Front Page

0

EU finds that Google’s Motorola abused its patent power in seeking an injunction against Apple

The New York Times reports that the European Commission issued a preliminary finding which holds that Motorola abused its patent power in seeking an injunction against Apple in Germany for alleged patent infringement.

The EU investigation was precipitated by complaints from Microsoft and Apple who both alleged that Motorola was attempting to extract unfair licensing terms for standards essential patents.

While companies aren’t ordinarily required to license their patents out to competitors, patents which have been deemed essential to particular technological standards must be licensed out on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, otherwise known as FRAND.

That said, the EU ruling found that Motorola-owned patents relating to GSM mobile and wireless technologies were not offered to Apple at fair rates. When Apple refused to pay the royalties demanded by Motorola, the company subsequently filed a motion seeking to halt sales of the iPhone in Germany.

Motorola’s actions, the EU found, constituted “an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by E.U. antitrust rules.”

“I think that companies should spend their time innovating and competing on the merits of the products they offer – not misusing their intellectual property rights to hold up competitors to the detriment of innovation and consumer choice,” EU executive Joaquin Almunia explained in a news release.

Again, the EU’s finding was merely preliminary, but the ruling could eventually lead to a formal antitrust charge down the line. The Times has previously noted that the EU can fine companies found to be in violation of antitrust laws upwards of 10% of their annual income.

For what it’s worth, Motorola’s misguided attempt to secure an injunction against the iPhone first went into motion before they were acquired by Google. And seeing as how Google is now Motorola’s parent company, the search giant would now would now be held liable for any damages levied against Motorola.

EU finds that Google’s Motorola abused its patent power in seeking an injunction against Apple originally appeared on TUAW – The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Mon, 06 May 2013 21:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source | Permalink | Email this | Comments
TUAW – The Unofficial Apple Weblog

0

Angry Birds Friends recruits your Facebook friends in fight against the pigs

Charge your phone, hide your family and mourn the loss of your free time. Angry Birds has returned with the latest expansion of their fowl-flinging empire, Angry Birds Friends. The new version looks a lot like the old one at first glance. You still fling super-powered birds at structures in your quest to destroy the pig army. What’s new is the social interaction of judging your scores against your friends, across every platform Angry Birds on which is available.

Thats right; Facebook, iOS and Android friends can all play against each other in a seemingly never-ending quest to cook the pigs’ bacon. If you’ve already purchased Angry Birds in the past and don’t want to shell out for another new version, don’t worry. Angry Birds Friends, like friendship, is free.

The app is available now in the iTunes and Google Play stores.

Angry Birds Friends recruits your Facebook friends in fight against the pigs originally appeared on TUAW – The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Thu, 02 May 2013 19:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source | Permalink | Email this | Comments
TUAW – The Unofficial Apple Weblog

0

The bizarre campaign against Apple’s Tim Cook

A snowballing new “whisper campaign” is targeting Apple’s chief executive Tim Cook as being poor choice to run the company and a likely candidate for replacement in the months following its most successful quarter ever.





Add to Twitter




AppleInsider – Frontpage News

0

ITC throws out Motorola patent suit against Apple

The U.S. International Trade Commission on Monday ended a two-and-a-half year patent suit leveraged by Motorola against Apple, throwing out the the case as the last of six patents-in-suit was found to be invalid.





Add to Twitter




AppleInsider – Frontpage News